Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02880
Original file (BC 2014 02880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02880

	DANNY L. WAGNER			COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect his grade as Staff Sergeant    (SSgt/E-4).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The officer who signed his DD Form 214 put the incorrect rank down because he “had it out for him.”

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Air National Guard (ANG) on 21 Sep 66.

On 8 Mar 67, the applicant was released from active duty at the completion of training, and was furnished an Honorable discharge reflecting his grade of Airman Third Class (E-2).

On 28 Mar 69, the applicant was released from active duty at the completion of training, and was furnished an Honorable discharge in the grade of Sergeant (E-4).  

On 12 Sep 71, the applicant was discharged from the ANG and transferred to the Air Force Reserve in the grade of SSgt, effective 13 Sep 71.  

On 12 Sep 72, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge from the Reserve in the grade of SSgt.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice.  While the applicant was servicing in the ANG, he was ordered to active duty on two occasions for training.  His NGB Form 22, dated 12 Sep 71, and the two Honorable discharge certificates he submitted properly reflect his grade of SSgt because that was the grade he achieved in the ANG and Reserve.  However, he was not promoted to SSgt while serving in the Regular Air Force.  On the two occasions the applicant was released from active duty after training, his DD Forms 214 reflected his proper grades at the time of A1C on 8 Mar 67 and Sgt on 28 May 69.  Therefore, his DD Forms 214 are correct. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of AFPC/DPSOE and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02880 in Executive Session on 16 Apr 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Jul 14 w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 19 Aug 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Oct 14.

						

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01843

    Original file (BC 2013 01843.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01843 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected as follows: a. A though review of the applicant’s official military personnel records indicated there is no official documentation verifying the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02450

    Original file (BC 2014 02450.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02450 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade, as reflected on his DD Form 214, Armed Force of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect Airman First Class (E-4) rather than Airman Second Class (E-3). Based on the evidence of record, his DD Form 214 accurately reflects his grade at the time of discharge from the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00999

    Original file (BC-2010-00999.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 Sep 58 (which was later changed to 1 May 57 per Special Order B-67), he was promoted to the grade of A2C and on 1 Oct 61, he was promoted to the grade of airman first class. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial and states the application should be time barred. Promotion boards selected individuals and the quotas received determined the number that could be promoted.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00762

    Original file (BC-2011-00762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00762 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade of staff sergeant (SSgt/E-5) be reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) on 24 Jan 11. ACD- 00199, issued...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01137

    Original file (BC 2014 01137.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial due to the untimely filing of this application. He had a date for promotion to SSgt under the WAPS system in 1970, and if he had reenlisted he would have been promoted. Due to the fact that he was not awarded the PH and AFCM in 2009 and 2010, timing...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02024

    Original file (BC 2014 02024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02024 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His rank listed on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued 28 Jan 14, in Block 4a/b, Grade, Rate or Rank/Pay Grade, be changed to Staff Sergeant (SSgt/E-5). The DD Form 214 reflects the active duty grade the member held at time of retirement. IAW 10 USC 1372, our...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04842

    Original file (BC 2013 04842.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04842 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at ExhibitS C, D and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID states no further action is required concerning the applicant’s request for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01633

    Original file (BC-2010-01633.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01633 INDEX CODE: 111.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The AF Forms 707, Field Grade Officer Effectiveness Reports (OERs), rendered on him as a major be reviewed and he receive a direct promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel with a date of rank retroactive to the date he was first...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00350

    Original file (BC 2014 00350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the 99 ABW Commander’s letter dated 4 Dec 13, she was issued a written no-contact order on 8 Feb 13 by the First Sergeant to stay away from another member of the 99 LRS per a request from Security Forces investigators because the applicant was discussing the open investigation with the said person. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 28 Jul 14, copies of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01708

    Original file (BC 2014 01708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01708 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His rank listed on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued 3 Dec 07, in Block 4a/b, Grade, Rate or Rank/Pay Grade, be changed to Staff Sergeant (SSgt/E-5). His untimely application should be considered in the interest of justice because he received a form from the Physical...